Đề bài IELTS Writing Task 2 dạng Discuss both views: Some people believe that governments should invest heavily in developing public charging infrastructure for electric vehicles, even if only a small proportion of citizens currently use them. Others argue that public funds should instead be allocated to improving traditional public transport systems, which benefit a larger number of people. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
>> Cách Viết Dạng Discuss Both Views Trong IELTS Writing Task 2
Bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 dạng Discuss both views
The growing popularity of electric vehicles has sparked debate over how governments should allocate public funds. While some advocate heavy investment in charging infrastructure despite the limited number of current users, others argue that improving traditional public transport would bring broader benefits. I firmly believe that adopting a well-calibrated investment strategy would be the most realistic and effective solution for governments in addressing this issue.
Supporters argue that funding charging stations is a forward-thinking strategy. One key reason is that the shortage of facilities remains a major barrier to widespread adoption of electric vehicles. Without accessible charging points, consumers are reluctant to switch due to convenience concerns. In addition, expanding infrastructure creates a more conducive environment for innovation. This encourages companies to invest further in clean technology development. It is also worth noting that greater EV use would help mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Such progress reflects a long-term commitment to sustainable development.
Opponents maintain that upgrading public transport would bring more immediate and tangible benefits. In the first place, buses and trains serve a larger share of the population every day. Improving them enhances social equity, especially for low-income citizens. Furthermore, efficient public transport reduces congestion in urban areas. This leads to shorter travel times and higher productivity. Finally, it is often viewed as a more cost-effective solution to environmental issues. By transporting many passengers at once, it maximises societal benefit while cutting emissions.
From my perspective, although charging infrastructure is important, prioritising public transport would maximise societal benefit in the short term while still supporting environmental goals. Overall, a carefully balanced policy would be the most pragmatic approach for governments.
>> Cách Làm Dạng Bài Agree – Disagree Trong IELTS Writing Part 2
Giải nghĩa từ vựng band 8.0 trong bài IELTS Writing
-
well-calibrated investment strategy
→ chiến lược đầu tư được tính toán và điều chỉnh cẩn thận -
forward-thinking strategy
→ chiến lược có tầm nhìn xa, hướng đến tương lai -
barrier to widespread adoption
→ rào cản đối với việc áp dụng/triển khai rộng rãi -
conducive environment
→ môi trường thuận lợi -
mitigate greenhouse gas emissions
→ giảm thiểu lượng khí thải gây hiệu ứng nhà kính -
long-term commitment to sustainable development
→ cam kết dài hạn đối với sự phát triển bền vững -
immediate and tangible benefits
→ lợi ích tức thời và rõ ràng -
social equity
→ công bằng xã hội -
cost-effective solution
→ giải pháp hiệu quả về mặt chi phí -
societal benefit
→ lợi ích cho toàn xã hội - pragmatic approach
→ cách tiếp cận thực tế
Trên đây là bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 dạng Discuss both views and give your own opinion, về chủ đề đầu tư về hạ tầng cho xe điện hay cải thiện hệ thống giao thông cho tất cả phương tiện? Nếu bạn muốn thực hành thêm nhiều chủ đề khác, để mở rộng vốn kiến thức nền, và thu nạp thêm nhiều từ vựng với khoá IELTS cam kết đầu ra, với nhiều ưu đãi cho những ai đang theo dõi kênh Tự Tin Vào Đời, thì đừng ngại nhắn tin cho kênh nhé!
—